AN ANALYSIS OF POPULAR JUSTICE ON POLISH FACEBOOK DISCUSSION GROUPS
 
More details
Hide details
1
Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
 
Security and Defence Quarterly 2018;19(2):78–93
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The subject of this article is the efficiency of popular justice as the informal mechanism of public safety production on the example of Polish users of facebook.com. The investigation was based on the empirical data collected from Polish public discussion groups on the facebook website. The qualitative analysis of digital data allowed a presentation of what forms popular justice takes today and what kind of reconceptualisation it undergoes in comparison to its previous forms. The theory that backed up the study was the concept of informal institutions which allowed the most important characteristics and their changes to be demonstrated. The results show that popular justice is an ineffective mechanism of public safety production because of its selectivity and the high level of emotions related to judging people, which makes a just judgment impossible.
 
REFERENCES (14)
1.
Berg, M., 2011. Popular Justice. A History of Lynching in America. Ivan R. Dee Press, Chicago.
 
2.
Burke, P., 2009. Popular Culture in Early Modern Europe. Ashgate Publishing, New York.
 
3.
Campos, M., Marques, A. G., Aguiar, T., Cardoso, S. G., Pinto, I. R., Marques, J. M., 2017. Popular Justice on Bullies: Attributions of Responsibility, Anger, and Ineff ective Social Control as Fuel for Non-Normative Collective Action. Psicologia 31(2), 47-56.
 
4.
Dobrowolski, P. T., 2017. Popular Justice or Why Were Th ere No Sans-Culottes in America? Kwartalnik Historyczny CXXIV(1), 39-77.
 
5.
Drake, D., 2002. Intellectuals and Politics in Post-War France. Palgrave MacMillan, New York.
 
6.
Forsdyke, S., 2008. Street Th eatre and Popular Justice in Ancient Greece: Shaming, Stoning and Starving Off enders Inside and Outside the Courts. Past and Present 201, 3-50.
 
7.
Foucault, M., 1980. On Popular Justice: A Discussion with Maoists. In C. Gordon (ed.), Power/Knowledge. Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977. Pantheon Books, New York.
 
8.
Foucault, M., 1991. Discipline and Punish. Th e Birth of the Prison. Penguin Books, London.
 
9.
Helmke, G. and Levitsky, S., 2004. Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda. Perspectives on Politics 2(4), 725-740.
 
10.
IRCenter report, 2017. [online] Available from: http://www.wirtualnemedia.pl/a... proc-polskich-internautow-korzysta-z-social-media-liderem-facebook-w-goreyoutube [Accessed 26 May 2018].
 
11.
Macey, D., 2004. Michel Foucault. Reaktion Books, London.
 
12.
Maj, K. 2018. [online] Available from: http://natemat.pl/235409,trene... dlaczego-internauci-bronia-milosza-p [Accessed 28 Apr 2018].
 
13.
Merry, S. E., 1993. Sorting Out Popular Justice. In S. E. Merry, N. Milner (ed.), Th e Possibility of Popular Justice: A Case Study of Community. Mediation in the United States. Th e University of Michigan Press.
 
14.
Santos, B., 1982. Law and Revolution in Portugal: Th e Experiences of Popular Justice in Portugal after the 25th of April, 1974. In R. L. Abel (ed.), Th e Politics of Informal Justice, pp. 251-281. Academic Press, New York.
 
eISSN:2544-994X
ISSN:2300-8741