RESEARCH PAPER
EUROPEAN UNION COMMON SECURITY AND DEFENCE POLICY AND LATVIAN INVOLVEMENT IN EU BATTLEGROUPS
 
More details
Hide details
1
Riga Stradiņš University, Latvia
Online publish date: 2019-04-20
Publish date: 2019-06-28
 
Security and Defence Quarterly 2019;24(2):202–212
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
In this article, the author analyses types of Europeanisation: top-down, bottom-up, horizontal, circular, and looks at Latvian involvement in the EU CSDP capability project - EU Battlegroups. Additionally, the author analyses the EU CSDP strategies in 2003 and 2016 with emphasis on key threats and key directions of action for the security of the EU. If it is necessary, EU Battlegroups can become involved to secure the EU. In the article, the author examines Latvian involvement in EU Battlegroups and changes in political planning documents and legal acts regarding EU Battlegroups. The author shows that for the future, it is necessary to involve an EU Battlegroup in real action in the area of operations, and that it is necessary to initiate discussions on a possible review and evaluation of the format of the EU Battlegroup.
 
REFERENCES (14)
1.
Archer, C., 2010. Small States and the Europen Security and defence Policy. In: R. Steinmets and A. Wivel, ed. Small States in Europe Challenges and Opportunities. London: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
 
2.
Börzel, T.A. and Panke, D., 2013. Europeanization. In: M. Cini and N.P.S.Borragan, ed. European Union Politics. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 115-128.
 
3.
Cottey, A., 2007. Security in the new Europe. Basingstoke England: Palgrave Macmillan.
 
4.
Flochart, T., 2010. Europeanization or EU-ization? Th e Transfer of European Norms across Time and Space. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(4), pp.787-810. [online]. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/20184... z ation_The_Transfer_of_European_Norms_across_Time_and_Space?auto=download [Accessed 15 Oct 2018].
 
5.
Hang, N.T.T., 2011. Europeanization: Simply a Top-down Process? Marmara Journal of European Studies, 19 (1), 135-151. Available from: http://dosya.marmara.edu.tr/av... [Accessed 15 Oct 2018].
 
6.
Major, C. and Pomorska, K., 2005. Th eorising the Eff ects of the CFSP on National Foreign Policy and the Concept of Europeanisation. A network of research and teaching on European Foreign Policy: CFSP Forum, 3(5). [online]. Available from: http://www.lse.ac.uk/internati... [Accessed 15 Oct 2018].
 
7.
Vale, J. R., 2011. Is ‘Europeanization’ a Useful Concept?. [online]. E-International Relations. Available from: http://www.e-ir.info/2011/01/1... [Accessed 15 Oct 2018].
 
8.
EU Global Strategy., 2003. European Security Strategy - A Secure Europe in a Better World - EU Global Strategy - European Commission. [online]. Available from: https://europa.eu/globalstrate... [Accessed 14 Oct 2018].
 
9.
Likumi.lv., 2018. Participation of the Latvian National Armed Forces in International Operations. [online]. Available from: https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/... [Accessed 14 Oct 2018].
 
10.
EEAS - European External Action Service, 2016. Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe. [online] Available from: https://eeas.europa.eu/archive... [Accessed 14 Oct 2018].
 
11.
EEAS - European External Action Service., 2018. EU Battlegroups - EEAS - European External Action Service - European Commission. [online]. Available from: https://eeas.europa.eu/headqua... [Accessed 14 Oct. 2018].
 
12.
Mod.gov.lv., 2019a. Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Latvia. [online]. Available from: https://www.mod.gov.lv/en/node... [Accessed 7 Apr 2019].
 
13.
Mod.gov.lv., 2019b. Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Latvia. [online]. Available from:https://www.mod.gov.lv/lv/doku... [Accessed 7 Apr 2019].
 
14.
Mil.lv., 2019. National Armed forces. [online]. Available from: https://www.mil.lv/en/node/616 [Accessed 7 Apr 2019].
 
eISSN:2544-994X
ISSN:2300-8741