Online first
Current issue
All issues
About
Guide for authors
Call for papers
1/2016 vol. 10
Stats
Get citation
Geopolitical consequences arising from involvement of Russia in the conflict in Ukraine
Sławomir Piotrowski
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
 
Publication date: 2016-03-31
 
 
Security and Defence Quarterly 2016;10(1):5-20
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/23008741.1215394
 
 
Article (PDF)
References (20)
 
KEYWORDS
Russia
NATO
Far East
Middle East
Turkey
France
Germany
European
Union
Donbas
conflict in Ukraine
security challenges
geostrategic situation
 
ABSTRACT
The crisis in eastern Ukraine and Crimea is undoubtedly one of the greatest challenges of security currently facing the international community. In pursuing its objectives, the state is often guided by different motives, but the common denominator change in the approach to cooperation with Russia is now Ukraine. The author analyses the changing geostrategic situation surrounding Russia, which is the result of its involvement in the Ukrainian crisis. This has also been analysed by countries like China, Japan, India, Turkey and Middle East countries.
 
REFERENCES (20)
1.
According to the official vote ended with the victory of pro-Russian option. It was attended by 83.1 percent of eligible residents of the Crimea, which was up 96.8 for connecting the peninsula to Russia.
Google Scholar
 
 
2.
Journalist American edition of “Forbes” Paul Roderick Gregory revealed that for a moment on the sides of the Presidential Council for Civil Society and Human Rights report bore providing a completely different outcome. According to an unofficial report, only 30 percent voted. Crimean residents, half of whom supported the idea of “unification” with Russia. This means that a total of only 15 percent. with the right to vote inhabitants of the peninsula was a connection; source: Putin’s ‘Human Rights Council’ Accidentally Posts Real Crimean Election Results, http://www.forbes.com/sites/pa... putins-human-rights-council-accidentally-posts-real-crimean-election-results-only-15- voted-for-annexation/, (access: 05.05.2014 r.)
Google Scholar
 
 
3.
In 2001, in the Crimea lived 58.5% of Russians, 24.4% of Ukrainians and 12.1% of Tatars.
Google Scholar
 
 
4.
M. Menkiszak, R. Sadowski, P. Żochowski, Rosyjska interwencja zbrojna we wschodniej Ukrainie, http://www.osw.waw.pl/pl/publi...- zbrojna-we-wschodniej-ukrainie (Access: 03.09.2014 r.).
Google Scholar
 
 
5.
Ibidem.
Google Scholar
 
 
6.
The first actions of the Russian armed forces on the territory of Crimea were observed on 26th February 2014. Which was only four days after Viktor Yanukovych escaped.
Google Scholar
 
 
7.
B. Wesel, Unia Europejska hamuje Partnerstwo Wschodnie, http://www.dw.com/pl/unia- europejska-hamuje-partnerstwo-wschodnie/a-18471246 (Access: 22.05.2015 r.).
Google Scholar
 
 
8.
A. Kwiatkowska-Drożdż, Niemcy wobec Rosji. Powiązania – TAK, Zbliżenie – NIE [w:] Punkt widzenia nr 39, wyd. Ośrodka Studiów Wschodnich, Warszawa 2014, s. 5.
Google Scholar
 
 
9.
Ibidem, s. 6.
Google Scholar
 
 
10.
MSZ Rosji o wydarzeniach 2015 roku, http://wiadomosci.onet.pl/swia...- o-wydarzeniach-2015-roku-upolityczniony-kurs-ue-na-konfrontacje-z-rosja/mmw9cd (access: 29.12.2015 r.).
Google Scholar
 
 
11.
Mohammed al-Khatieb, How the Syrian regime forces are attacking opposition under Russian cover, http://www.al-monitor.com/puls...- attack-opposition-russian-cover.html#ixzz3ywyFQ2Sa (access: 21.10.2015 r.).
Google Scholar
 
 
12.
S. Kardaś, Gazowe „partnerstwo” wschodnie: kontrakt Gazpromu i CNPC na dostawy gazu do Chin, http://www.osw.waw.pl/pl/publi...- partnerstwo-wschodnie-kontrakt-gazpromu-i-cnpc-na (Access: 16.06.2014 r.).
Google Scholar
 
 
13.
ANGIEGIZA, Współpraca gospodarcza Rosji i Chin, https://azjacentralna.wordpres.... com/2015/01/19/ wspolpraca-gospodarcza-rosji-i-chin/ (Access: 19.01.2015 r.).
Google Scholar
 
 
14.
P. Behrendt, Reset rosyjsko-japońskiego resetu?, http://www.polska-azja.pl/2015... p-behrendt-reset-rosyjsko-japonskiego-resetu/ (Access: 27.11.2015 r.).
Google Scholar
 
 
15.
A. Piwońska, Przyjaźń indyjsko-rosyjska, http://www.stosunkimiedzynarod... przyja%C5%BA%C5%84-indyjsko-rosyjska (Access: 09.05.2012 r.).
Google Scholar
 
 
16.
A. Sanzhiev, Russia offers Turkish slot to India, http://in.rbth.com/economics/ cooperation/2015/12/09/russia-offers-turkish-slot-to-india_549161 (Access: 09.12.2015 r.).
Google Scholar
 
 
17.
Important partners in the development of Iran’s nuclear program were also: China and North Korea.
Google Scholar
 
 
18.
M. Jastrzębki, Tajemnicza wizyta prezydenta Syrii w Moskwie, http://www.polskieradio. pl/5/3/Artykul/1533981,Kreml-prezydent-Syrii-spotkal-sie-w-Moskwie-z-Putinem (Access: 21.10.2015 r.).
Google Scholar
 
 
19.
M Połoński, Czy Rosja będzie głównym rozgrywającym na Bliskim Wschodzie?, http:// fede.org.pl/polonski-czy-rosja-bedzie-glownym-rozgrywajacym-na-bliskim-wschodzie/ (Access: 15.09.2015 r.).
Google Scholar
 
 
20.
S. Ananicz, Turcja wobec rosyjskiej interwencji wojskowej na Krymie, http://www.osw. waw.pl/pl/publikacje/analizy/2014-03-05/turcja-wobec-rosyjskiej-interwencji-wojskowej- na-krymie (Access: 05.03.2014 r.).
Google Scholar
 
 
Share
Send by email
RELATED ARTICLE
Gender diversity management in NATO for sustainable security and peace
Introduction to Special Issue on Navigating NATO dynamics: Addressing various challenges in the international security environment
The cost of appeasement
Assessing the Cost of Friction between NATO Allies
Review of the book by Sara Bazoobandi (2020), The New Regional Order in the Middle East: Changes and Challenges. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 141, ISBN 978-3-030-27885-4
Indexes
 
Keywords index
Topics index
Authors index
eISSN:2544-994X
ISSN:2300-8741
Journals System - logo
SDQ is co-financed by the Polish Ministry of Education and Science in the framework of the ministerial programme “Development of Scientific Journals” (RCN), on the basis of contract no. RCN/SP/0381/2021/1.
© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
Scroll to top