Online first
Current issue
All issues
About
Aims and scope
Peer review process
Publication policy & ethics
Editorial Board
Reviewers
Publisher
Guide for authors
Call for papers
Book Reviews
Special Issues Archive
Multidimensional Challenges for National and International Security in the Context of Hybrid Warfare
Societal, Environmental, and Technological Determinants of Security
NATO in the Face of Emerging Security Challenges on its Eastern Flank
Geopolitical consequences arising from involvement of Russia in the conflict in Ukraine
Publication date: 2016-03-31
Security and Defence Quarterly 2016;10(1):5–20
KEYWORDS
RussiaNATOFar EastMiddle EastTurkeyFranceGermanyEuropeanUnionDonbasconflict in Ukrainesecurity challengesgeostrategic situation
ABSTRACT
The crisis in eastern Ukraine and Crimea is undoubtedly one of the greatest challenges of
security currently facing the international community. In pursuing its objectives, the state
is often guided by different motives, but the common denominator change in the approach
to cooperation with Russia is now Ukraine. The author analyses the changing geostrategic
situation surrounding Russia, which is the result of its involvement in the Ukrainian crisis.
This has also been analysed by countries like China, Japan, India, Turkey and Middle East
countries.
REFERENCES (20)
1.
According to the official vote ended with the victory of pro-Russian option. It was attended by 83.1 percent of eligible residents of the Crimea, which was up 96.8 for connecting the peninsula to Russia.
2.
Journalist American edition of “Forbes” Paul Roderick Gregory revealed that for a moment on the sides of the Presidential Council for Civil Society and Human Rights report bore providing a completely different outcome. According to an unofficial report, only 30 percent voted. Crimean residents, half of whom supported the idea of “unification” with Russia. This means that a total of only 15 percent. with the right to vote inhabitants of the peninsula was a connection; source: Putin’s ‘Human Rights Council’ Accidentally Posts Real Crimean Election Results, http://www.forbes.com/sites/pa... putins-human-rights-council-accidentally-posts-real-crimean-election-results-only-15- voted-for-annexation/, (access: 05.05.2014 r.)
3.
In 2001, in the Crimea lived 58.5% of Russians, 24.4% of Ukrainians and 12.1% of Tatars.
4.
M. Menkiszak, R. Sadowski, P. Żochowski, Rosyjska interwencja zbrojna we wschodniej Ukrainie, http://www.osw.waw.pl/pl/publi...- zbrojna-we-wschodniej-ukrainie (Access: 03.09.2014 r.).
6.
The first actions of the Russian armed forces on the territory of Crimea were observed on 26th February 2014. Which was only four days after Viktor Yanukovych escaped.
7.
B. Wesel, Unia Europejska hamuje Partnerstwo Wschodnie, http://www.dw.com/pl/unia- europejska-hamuje-partnerstwo-wschodnie/a-18471246 (Access: 22.05.2015 r.).
8.
A. Kwiatkowska-Drożdż, Niemcy wobec Rosji. Powiązania – TAK, Zbliżenie – NIE [w:] Punkt widzenia nr 39, wyd. Ośrodka Studiów Wschodnich, Warszawa 2014, s. 5.
10.
MSZ Rosji o wydarzeniach 2015 roku, http://wiadomosci.onet.pl/swia...- o-wydarzeniach-2015-roku-upolityczniony-kurs-ue-na-konfrontacje-z-rosja/mmw9cd (access: 29.12.2015 r.).
11.
Mohammed al-Khatieb, How the Syrian regime forces are attacking opposition under Russian cover, http://www.al-monitor.com/puls...- attack-opposition-russian-cover.html#ixzz3ywyFQ2Sa (access: 21.10.2015 r.).
12.
S. Kardaś, Gazowe „partnerstwo” wschodnie: kontrakt Gazpromu i CNPC na dostawy gazu do Chin, http://www.osw.waw.pl/pl/publi...- partnerstwo-wschodnie-kontrakt-gazpromu-i-cnpc-na (Access: 16.06.2014 r.).
13.
ANGIEGIZA, Współpraca gospodarcza Rosji i Chin, https://azjacentralna.wordpres.... com/2015/01/19/ wspolpraca-gospodarcza-rosji-i-chin/ (Access: 19.01.2015 r.).
14.
P. Behrendt, Reset rosyjsko-japońskiego resetu?, http://www.polska-azja.pl/2015... p-behrendt-reset-rosyjsko-japonskiego-resetu/ (Access: 27.11.2015 r.).
15.
A. Piwońska, Przyjaźń indyjsko-rosyjska, http://www.stosunkimiedzynarod... przyja%C5%BA%C5%84-indyjsko-rosyjska (Access: 09.05.2012 r.).
16.
A. Sanzhiev, Russia offers Turkish slot to India, http://in.rbth.com/economics/ cooperation/2015/12/09/russia-offers-turkish-slot-to-india_549161 (Access: 09.12.2015 r.).
17.
Important partners in the development of Iran’s nuclear program were also: China and North Korea.
18.
M. Jastrzębki, Tajemnicza wizyta prezydenta Syrii w Moskwie, http://www.polskieradio. pl/5/3/Artykul/1533981,Kreml-prezydent-Syrii-spotkal-sie-w-Moskwie-z-Putinem (Access: 21.10.2015 r.).
19.
M Połoński, Czy Rosja będzie głównym rozgrywającym na Bliskim Wschodzie?, http:// fede.org.pl/polonski-czy-rosja-bedzie-glownym-rozgrywajacym-na-bliskim-wschodzie/ (Access: 15.09.2015 r.).
20.
S. Ananicz, Turcja wobec rosyjskiej interwencji wojskowej na Krymie, http://www.osw. waw.pl/pl/publikacje/analizy/2014-03-05/turcja-wobec-rosyjskiej-interwencji-wojskowej- na-krymie (Access: 05.03.2014 r.).
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.