RESEARCH PAPER
Is the European goal for defence research and technology expenditure attainable for small countries?
1
National Defence University, Helsinki, Finland
Online publication date: 2016-12-30
Publication date: 2016-12-30
Security and Defence Quarterly 2016;13(4):32-49
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
EU Defence Ministers have adopted a joint Strategy on Defence Research & Technology
(R&T) that includes a 2 % goal for defence R&T expenditure. Th is paper discusses the
feasibility of such a goal for a small country, including the motivations for undertaking
defence R&T work in small countries, and asks are they diff erent from the large countries?
New and improved weapons systems that create a technological advantage in the battlefi eld are grounded on research in technology. However, as capability models demonstrate, there are also other aspects of military capability than the materiel which can therefore be a topic for research. Th rough reviewing a selection of strategy documents from large and small European countries, the fact that only large countries have fi nancial possibilities for major weapons system development and production is highlighted, while in small countries, this link from R&T through development to production and operation is broken. Both defence research and defence industrial base fi gures support this view. Small countries may still have a number of other reasons to engage in R&T in either technology or other areas, but these appear not to be able to suffi ciently motivate R&T expenditure even close to the 2% level.
New and improved weapons systems that create a technological advantage in the battlefi eld are grounded on research in technology. However, as capability models demonstrate, there are also other aspects of military capability than the materiel which can therefore be a topic for research. Th rough reviewing a selection of strategy documents from large and small European countries, the fact that only large countries have fi nancial possibilities for major weapons system development and production is highlighted, while in small countries, this link from R&T through development to production and operation is broken. Both defence research and defence industrial base fi gures support this view. Small countries may still have a number of other reasons to engage in R&T in either technology or other areas, but these appear not to be able to suffi ciently motivate R&T expenditure even close to the 2% level.
REFERENCES (32)
1.
A. Middleton, S. Bowns, K. Hartley & J. Reid (2006) The effect of defence R&D on military equipment quality, Defence and Peace Economics, Vol.17 No. 02, pp. 117-139.
2.
P. Dunne, M. D. C. García-Alonso, P. Levine, & R. Smith, (2007). Determining the defence industrial base. Defence and Peace Economics, Vol 18 No 3, pp. 199-221
3.
EDA press release refers to government expenditure (or spending) on defence R&T as investment.
4.
EDA (2007) EU Ministers Adopt Framework for Joint European Strategy in Defence R&T, Press Release, [accessed 10.9.2016] available at: https://www.eda.europa.eu.
5.
NATO (2016) Defence Expenditures of NATO Countries, press release, [accessed 9.5.2016] available at: http://www.nato.int/nato_stati..._ 07/20160704_160704-pr2016-116.pdf
6.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2002). Frascati Manual 2002: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development. OECD, p. 30.
7.
S. Guzelytė, (2016) National Defence Data 2013-2014 and 2015 (est.) of the 27 EDA Member States, European Defence Agency, Brussels, Belgium. [accessed 10.9.2016] available at: https://www.eda.europa.eu.
8.
K. Hartley, (2006). Defence R&D: data issues. Defence and Peace Economics, Vol. 17 no. 3, pp. 169-175.
9.
R. Daft (1986) Organization theory and design, 2 nd ed., West Publishing Company, USA. Danish Business Authority, (2014) National Defence Industrial Strategy (pp. 13), [accessed 28.8.2016] available at: https://danishbusinessauthorit....
10.
K.Hartley, (2006). Defence R&D: data issues. Defence and Peace Economics, Vol. 17 no. 3, pp. 169-175.
11.
Z. Griliches, (1992). The Search for R&D Spillovers, 94 Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Vol 43, No. supplement, pp. 29-47.
12.
D.W. Versailles & V. Mérindol, (2006). Knowledge transfers and R&D management: An inquiry into the problem of transatlantic complementarities. Defence and Peace Economics, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 239-256.
13.
K.P. Reynolds, (2006) Building to Getting Military Transformation Right, Contemporary Security Policy, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp.435-471.
14.
The Australian Government Department of Defence (ADoD) (2006) Defence Capability Development Manual, Australia: Defence Publishing Service.
15.
Y. Yue & M. Henshaw, (2009). An Holistic View of UK Military Capability Development. Defense & Security Analysis, 25(1), 53-67.
16.
T. Jermalavičius, (2009). Defence Research & Development: Lessons from NATO Allies. p. 40 [accessed 11.8.2016] available at: http://nato.ee/sites/default/f... article_files/icds_report-defence_r_d-lessons_from_nato_allies.pdf, p. 8.
17.
C. Hagel, (2014). Quadrennial Defense Review. Offi ce of the Secretary of Defense, p. 25.
18.
J. Caverley, (2007) United States Hegemony and the New Economics of Defense, Security Studies, Vol 16 No 4, pp. 598-614.
19.
Ministry of Defence (2012) National Security Th rough Technology: Technology, Equipment, and Support for UK Defence and Security, White Paper Cm8278, [accessed 11.6.2016] available at: NATO (2016) Defence Expenditures of NATO Countries, press release, [accessed 9.5.2016] available at: http://www.nato.int/nato_stati... 2014/assets/pdf/ pdf_2016_07/20160704_160704-pr2016-116.pdf.
20.
Ministère de la Défense (2013) French White Paper on Defence and National Security – 2013, France, p. 135 [accessed 7.9.2016] available at: www.defense.gouv.fr/.
21.
Th e Federal Government of Germany (2016) White paper 2016 on German security policy and the future of the Bundeswehr, [accessed 1.9.2016] available at: https://www. bmvg.de/portal/a/bmvg/en, p. 129.
22.
Th e Federal Government of Germany (2015) Strategiepapier der Bundesregierung zur Stärkung der Verteidigungsindustrie in Deutschland (pp. 13), [accessed 11.8.2016].
23.
T. Bertlman and Å Anclair (2013) International Defence Cooperation Effi ciency, Solidarity, Sovereignty; Report from the Inquiry on Sweden’s International Defence Cooperation,Fö 2013:B; Swedish ministry of Defence 2013, p. 32, http://www.government. se/reports/2014/10/international-defence-cooperation---effi ciency-solidarity-sovereignty.
24.
Th e Netherlands Ministry of Economic Aff airs (2013) Th e Netherlands’ Defence Industry Strategy, (pp. 21), [accessed 28.8.2016] available at: https://www.government.nl/ documents/publications/2014/10/22/the-netherlands-defence-industry-strategy.
25.
Danish Business Authority, (2014) National Defence Industrial Strategy (pp. 13), [accessed 28.8.2016] available at: https://danishbusinessauthorit....
26.
Finnish Ministry of Defence (2016) Suomen puolustuksen teknologisen ja teollisen perustan turvaaminen (securing Finland’s defence technological and industrial base), valtioneuvoston periaatepäätös, [accessed 11.6.2016] available at: www.defmin.fi .
27.
EDA (2007) EU Ministers Adopt Framework for Joint European Strategy in Defence R&T, Press Release, [accessed 10.9. 2016] available at: https://www.eda.europa.eu
28.
S. Guzelytė, (2016) National Defence Data 2013-2014 and 2015 (est.) of the 27 EDA Member States, European Defence Agency, Brussels, Belgium. [accessed 10.9.2016] available at: https://www.eda.europa.eu
29.
Data from SIPRI is actually based on their Transfer Indicator Value that is an assessment made by SIPRI. TIVs indicate volume in the conventional arms trade and are expressed in 1990 USD. However, they are not necessarily based on actual sales and SIPRI cautions against comparisons to other sources.
30.
EDA (2007) EU Ministers Adopt Framework for Joint European Strategy in Defence R&T, Press Release, [accessed 10.9. 2016] available at: https://www.eda.europa.eu.
31.
S Guzelytė, (2016) National Defence Data 2013-2014 and 2015 (est.) of the 27 EDA Member States, European Defence Agency, Brussels, Belgium. [accessed 10.9.2016] available at: https://www.eda.europa.eu.
CITATIONS (1):
1.
Avrupa Birliği Ülkelerinde Kamu Harcamaları Yakınsıyor Mu? Kulüp Yakınsama Üzerine Kanıtlar
GEZDİM BAYRAK
Sosyoekonomi
GEZDİM BAYRAK
Sosyoekonomi
| eISSN: | 2544-994X |
| ISSN: | 2300-8741 |
© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
