RESEARCH PAPER
Operations in subterranean systems: Terrain and weather variable
 
More details
Hide details
1
Military University Institute, Portugal
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
José Paulo Silva Bartolomeu   

Military University Institute, Lisbon, Portugal
Online publication date: 2020-04-15
Submission date: 2019-12-29
Final revision date: 2020-03-30
Acceptance date: 2020-03-31
 
Security and Defence Quarterly 2020;29(2):39–60
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The overall objective of the research is to summarize tactical considerations, resulting from terrain and weather analysis, to support the preparation, planning and execution of subterranean operations. The study used the Grounded Theory for collection, analysis, and systematic treatment of data. The main data sources for the study consisted of purposive sampling from operations in subterranean systems and lessons learned from them. Two new sub-variables are now proposed to be included in terrain and weather variable from mission analysis model for subterranean operations: Subterranean system’s location and accesses and subterranean system features. The key to finding subterranean systems is through terrain analysis, physical ground search, operational indicators, and intelligence products. The analysis of the features of the subterranean system and its mapping is critical for developing courses of action. Forces must be trained and equipped to manoeuvre and combat at short distances and poor visibility conditions. Surface access points and command and control bunkers usually are assessed as key terrain. Obstacles placed at intersections are excellent ambush sites. Accessing sophisticated structures requires specific techniques and equipment. Inside the subterranean systems, existing angles, barriers, walls, cavities, stairwells and other objects provide cover and concealment. Water can make it impossible to build subterranean systems, place obstacles, or even use them; droughts can “create” new avenues of approach. Clouds and fog difficult the detection of subterranean systems. The terrain and weather analysis model, the characteristics, and the tactical considerations presented, all combined, support the preparation, planning, and execution of operations in subterranean systems.
 
REFERENCES (54)
1.
Ahronheim, A. (2018) ‘IDF Hezbollah tunnel-destroying material discovered in Lebanon’, Jerusalem Post, 27 December, Available from: https://www.jpost.com/Arab-Isr... (Accessed: 9 September 2019).
 
2.
Bryman, A. (2012) Social Research Methods. 4.ª ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
 
3.
Charmaz, K. (2008) ‘Grounded Theory as an emergent method’, in Hesse-Bilber, S. N. and Leavy, P. (eds.), Handbook of emergent methods. New York, NY: The Guilford Press, pp. 155–172.
 
4.
Cohen, R. S., Johnson, D. E., Thaler, D. E., Allen, B., Bartels, E. M., Cahill, J., Efron, S. (2017) From Cast Lead to Protective Edge: Lessons from Israel’s Wars in Gaza. Santa Monica, Calif: RAND Corporation.
 
5.
Cordesman, A. H. (2003) The lessons of the Iraq War: main report. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies.
 
6.
Creswell, J. (2009) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. 3th edn. Los Angeles: Sage.
 
7.
Crowley, R. (2005) Constantinople: The Last Great Siege1453. London, England: Faber and Faber Limited Bloomsbury House.
 
8.
Dershowitz, A. M. (2014) ‘Terror Tunnels: The Case for Israel’s Just War Against Hamas’, Gatestone Institute, 12 September, Available at: https://www.gatestoneinstitute... (Accessed: 9 September 2019).
 
9.
EP. (2012) Operações (PDE 3-00). Lisboa: EP.
 
10.
Feldman, R. T. (2008) Tha fall of Constantinople. Minneapolis: Twenty-First Century Books.
 
11.
Fishman, A. (2017) ‘What is Israel doing about the Gaza tunnels today?’, ynetnews.com, 03 July. Available at: https://www.ynetnews.com/artic... (Accessed: 12 September 2019).
 
12.
Fortin, M. F. (2003) O Processo de Investigação: da concepção à realização. Loures: Lusociência.
 
13.
FARS (2018) How Threats Posed by Tunnels Escalated in the Middle East, Available at: https://futureuae.com/ar-/Main... (Accessed: 9 September 2019).
 
14.
Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1967) The discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
 
15.
Grau, L. W. and Jalali, A. A. (1998) ‘Underground Combat: Stereophonic Blasting, Tunnel Rats and the Soviet-Afghan War’, Foreign Military Studies Office, Available at: https://community.apan.org/wg/... (Accessed: 10 September 2019).
 
16.
Hecht, E.(2015) The Tunnels in Gaza: Testimony before the UN Commission of Inquiry on the 2014 Gaza Conflict. Available at: https://www.mideastdig.com/wp-... (Accessed: 04 October 2019).
 
17.
Herman, A. (2014) Notes from the underground: the long history of tunnel warfare. Available at: https://www.hudson.org/researc... (Accessed: 21 October 2019).
 
18.
Illinois Central Railroad Company (1909) Siege and defence of Vicksburg and the Vicksburg National Military Park. Available at: https://babel.hathitrust.org/c... (Accessed: 10 September 2019).
 
19.
Jensen, B. M. (2019) Complex terrain: megacities and the changing character of urban combat. Quantico, Virginia: Navy, Marine Corps University Press.
 
20.
Jones, S. (2010) Underground Warfare 1914-1918. South Yorkshire: Pen & Sword Military.
 
21.
Kinard, J. (1998) The Battle of the Crater: Civil War campaigns and commanders. Texas: Mcwhiney Foundation Press.
 
22.
Lambeth, B. S. (2011) Air Operations in Israel’s war against Hezbollah: learning from Lebanon and getting it right in Gaza. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
 
23.
Lrrp. (2008) Tunnel Warfare - Vietnam Experience [Web log post]. Available at: https://lrrp2.wordpress.com/20... (Accessed: 13 September 2019).
 
24.
NATO. (2017) Urban Tactics: Edition A Version 1 (ATP-99). NATO Standardization Office.
 
25.
NATO. (2018) Allied Land Tactics: Edition B Version 1(ATP-3.2.1). NATO Standardization Office.
 
26.
NATO. (2019) Tactical Planning for Land Forces: Edition A Version 1 (AAP-28). NATO Standardization Office.
 
27.
NORAD. (n.d.) Cheyenne Mountain Complex [Online page]. Available at: https://www.norad.mil/About-NO... (Accessed: 13 September 2019).
 
28.
NSA. (2013) Underground Facilities: Intelligence and Targeting Issues. Available at: https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSA... (Accessed: 4 October 2019).
 
29.
Philippides, M. and Hanak, W. K. (2011) The Siege and the Fall of Constantinople in 1453: Historiography, Topography, and Military Studies. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
 
30.
Richemond-Barak, D. (2018) Underground Warfare. New York: Oxford University Press.
 
31.
Rossman, J. (1994) In the Warsaw Sewers. Zeszyty Historyczne, No. 109. Paris: Instytut Literacki. Available at: http://www.warsawuprising.com/... (Accessed: 15 September 2019).
 
32.
Rottman, G. (2006) Viet Cong and NVA Tunnels and Fortifications of the Vietnam War (Fortress 48). New York: Osprey Publishing.
 
33.
Schmutz, J. F. (2009) The Battle of the Crater: A Complete History. North Carolina: McFarland & Company, Inc.
 
34.
Sepp, E. M. (2000) Deeply Buried Facilities. Implications for Military Operations (Occasional Paper No. 14). Air War College, Alabama.
 
35.
Shapir, Y. and Perel, G. (2014) Subterranean Warfare: A New-Old Challenge. In: A. Kurz, and S. Brom (Ed.), The Lessons of Operation Protective Edge (pp. 51–57) Tel Aviv: Institute for National Security Studies. Available at: https://www.inss.org.il/public... (Accessed: 04 October 2019).
 
36.
Short, N. (2004) Germany’s West Wall: The Siegfried Line (Fortress 15). S.l.: Osprey Publishing.
 
37.
Springer, P. J. (2015) ‘Fighting under the earth: the history of tunneling in warfare’. Foreign Policy Research Institute. Available at: https://www.fpri.org/article/2... (Accessed: 9 September 2019).
 
38.
Strauss, A. (1987) Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
 
39.
Triolet, J. and Triolet, L. (2011) La guerre souterraine: Sous terre, on se bat aussi. Paris, France: Perrin.
 
40.
USA (1980) Engineering and Design Rock Reinforcement. Washington DC: Department of the Army.
 
41.
USA (2014) Subterranean Environment: Tunnel to Victory, the 2006 Lebanon War. Fort Leavenworth: Comple Operational Environment and Threat Integration Directorate.
 
42.
USA (2016) Commander and Staff Organization and Operations (FM 6-0). Washington DC: Departmentof the Army.
 
43.
USA (2017a) Operations (ADRP 3-0). Washington DC: Department of the Army.
 
44.
USA (2017b) Small Unit Training in Subterranean Environments (TC 3-21.50). Washington DC: Department of the Army.
 
45.
USA (2017c) Urban Operations (ATP 3-06/ MCTP 12-10B). Washington DC: Department of the Army.
 
46.
USA (2019a) Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield (ATP 2-01.3). Washington DC: Department of the Army.
 
47.
USA (2019b) Mission Command: Command and Control of Army Forces (ADP 6-0). Washington DC: Department of the Army.
 
48.
USA (2019c) Subterranean Operations (ATP 3-21.51). Washington DC: Department of the Army.
 
49.
USMAC-V. (1965) Lessons Learned no. 45: Viet Cong Turmels Available at: http://cgsc.contentdm.oclc.org... (Accessed: 2 October 2019).
 
50.
USMAC-V. (1966) Lessons learned no. 56: operations against tunnel complexes. Available at: http://cgsc.contentdm.oclc.org... (Accessed: 2 October 2019).
 
51.
USMAC-V. (1967) Counterinsurgency Lessons Learned no. 61: Salient Lessons Learned. Available at: http://cgsc.contentdm.oclc.org... (Accessed: 2 October 2019).
 
52.
USMAC-V. (1968) Techniques for Detecting, Neutralizing and Destroying Enemy Tunnels. Available at: https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/... (Accessed: 3 October 2019).
 
53.
Yin, R. K. (2016) Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. 2nd edn. New York: The Guilford Press.
 
54.
Zhang, H. (2012) China’s Underground Great Wall: Subterranean Ballistic Missiles. Belfer Center. Available at: https://www.belfercenter.org/p... (Accessed: 2 October 2019).
 
eISSN:2544-994X
ISSN:2300-8741