SAME THREAT, DIFFERENT ANSWERS? COMPARING AND ASSESSING NATIONAL CYBER DEFENCE STRATEGIES IN CENTRAL-EASTERN EUROPE
 
More details
Hide details
1
University Erlangen-Nuremberg and Catholic University Eichstätt Ingolstadt, Germany
 
Security and Defence Quarterly 2017;16(3):52–74
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
In the article, National Cyber Security Strategies (NCSS) of the Central and Eastern European states are compared and assessed. After it had become evident that a variety of crucial new threats to national security had emerged over recent years, virtually all states reacted with national strategies. These strategies are aimed at securing national cyberspace from cyber threats through legal, operational, technical and policy-related measures. They exist in addition to general national security strategies and are meant to support these. Even if most countries have National Cyber Security Strategies, the author demonstrates that these strategies show, at least in part, remarkable differences. The role national particularities play is explained, whether they are really this specific and whether they might be generalised and transferred to other national contexts and what approaches turned out best under what circumstances. Based on these results, existing strengths, weaknesses and best practices are explained to open avenues for improving existing strategies and generate a higher degree of strategy interoperability in an environment that maybe like no other requires international cooperation. It is evident that precise defi nitions of terms and concepts are essential. However, not all strategies provide those definitions, which might lead to misunderstandings and complicate cooperation both on domestic and international level. While some strategies offer clear cut responsibilities for the actors involved, others remain unclear. Even if laws are there to specify concrete procedures, the NCSS should not be too superficial. The NCSS itself should already make clear statements, particularly when it comes to the crucial aspect of coordinating the various cyber actors and stake holders. The author demonstrates that National Cyber Security Strategies ought to be detailed enough to clearly determine actors and responsibilities, but open and flexible enough for adaptability to fast developments.
 
REFERENCES (17)
1.
Fischer, B., 2017. Ein Weckruf für uns alle [14.05.2017]. http://www.faz.net/aktuell/ wirtschaft/netzwirtschaft/weltweiter-cyberangriff-mit-ransomware-offenbart- weltweite-sicherheitsluecken-15013861.html.
 
2.
Government of the Republic of Lithuania, 2011. Resolution No. 796 of 29 June 2011 on the Approval of the Programme for the Development of Electronic Information Security (Cyber Security) for 2011-2019, Vilnius.
 
3.
Luiijf, H.A.M, Besseling, K. and de Graaf, P., 2013. Nineteen national cyber security strategies. In International Journal for Critical Infrastructures 9(1, 2).
 
4.
Luiijf et al., 2013. Ten National Cyber Security Strategies: A Comparison. In Bologna et al. (2013) (eds): CRITIS 2011, LNCS 6983: 1-17.
 
5.
Ministry of Economic Aff airs and Communication of Estonia, 2014. Cyber Security Strategy 2014-2017, Talinn.
 
6.
Ministry of Defense of Hungary, 2012. Hungary’s Military Strategy, Budapest.
 
7.
Ministry of Foreign Aff airs of Hungary, 2012. Hungary’s National Security Strategy, Budapest.
 
8.
National Cyber Security Centre of the National Security Authority, 2015. NATIONAL CYBER SECURITY STRATEGY OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC FOR THE PERIOD FROM 2015 TO 2020, Prague.
 
9.
OECD (ed.), 2012. Cybersecurity Policy Making at a Turning Point, Analysing a new generation of national cybersecurity strategies for the Internet economy.
 
10.
Republic of Bulgaria, 2010. White Paper on Defence and the Armed Forces of the Republic of Bulgaria, Sofia.
 
11.
Republic of Croatia, 2015. THE NATIONAL CYBER SECURITY STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA, Offi cial Gazette 108, Zagreb.
 
12.
Republic of Latvia, 2014. Cyber Security Strategy of Latvia 2014-2018, Riga.
 
13.
Republic of Poland, Ministry of Administration and Digitisation, Internal Security Agency, 2013. Cyberspace Protection Policy of the Republic of Poland, Warsaw.
 
14.
Republic of Slovenia, 2016. Cyber Security Strategy, Establishing a System to Ensure a High Level of Cyber Security, Ljubljana.
 
15.
Sabillon, R., Cavaller, V. and Cano, J., 2016. National Cyber Security Strategies: Global Trends in Cyberspace. In International Journal of Computer Science and Software Engineering 5(5), pp. 67-81.
 
16.
Shafquat, Nermeen/Masood, Ashraf (2016): Comparative Analysis of Various National Cyber Security Strategies, in: International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security 15 (1): 129-136.
 
17.
Slovak Republic, 2015. Cyber Security Concept of the Slovak Republic for 2015 – 2020, Bratislava.
 
eISSN:2544-994X
ISSN:2300-8741