APPROACHES TO STUDYING ACROSS CULTURALLY CONTRASTING GROUPS: IMPLICATIONS FOR SECURITY EDUCATION
 
More details
Hide details
1
War Studies University, Warsaw, Poland
 
Security and Defence Quarterly 2017;16(3):3–19
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The problem of increased migration and integration of migrant children in schools has become a serious challenge for Security Education, especially the question of how to teach increasingly varied groups of students and whether students that come from culturally contrasting groups differ in their preferred learning style. This study sets out to analyse how students of various cultural backgrounds approach learning tasks, which is of utmost importance nowadays given that modern schools face the challenge of educating culturally diverse students. To this end, the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) was administered to 450 Thai students in a Thai university. Th e correlation between the learning approaches and individual differences (age, GPA and major) was assessed. Then, the results of the study were compared with the results of similar studies carried out in different cultures. The results show that the students scoring higher on the deep approach have the highest academic performance, whereas the students who approach the learning material strategically achieve the lowest learning outcomes. Furthermore, the Thai students did not differ significantly from their western peers (Norwegian, Egyptian, Portuguese and British); however, their results differed from the students from China, who generally scored lower on all subscales of the ASSIST scores. Thus, the findings of the study prove that the integration of migrant children can be highly successful because both migrant and host society students adopt similar approaches and strategies that strive for academic excellence.
 
REFERENCES (26)
1.
Apfelthaler G. et al, 2005. Cross-cultural learning styles in higher education. International Journal of Learning 22(5), 247-256.
 
2.
Coffi eld, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., and Ecclestone, K., 2004. Learning styles and pedagogy in post learning: a systematic and critical review. Cromwell Press: Trowbridge, Wiltshire.
 
3.
Diseth, A., 2001. Validation of a Norwegian version of the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST): Application of structural equation modelling. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 45(4), 381-394.
 
4.
Dogan, C.D., Atmaca, S. and Aslan Yolcu, F., 2012. Th e correlation between learning approaches and assessment preferences of eighth-grade students. Elementary Education Online 11(1), 264-272.
 
5.
Dunn, R. and Griggs, S., 1998. Learning styles: Link between teaching and learning. In R. Dunn and S. Griggs (Eds), 1998. Learning styles and the nursing profession. Jones & Barlett Learning: New York, 11-23.
 
6.
Dunn, R. and Dunn, K., 1993. Learning Styles/Teaching Styles: Should They••• Can They... Be Matched? Educational Leadership, 238-244.
 
7.
Entwistle, N.J., 2000. Promoting deep learning through teaching and assessment: conceptual frameworks and educational contexts. [15 March 2017] http://www.leeds. ac.uk/educol/documents/0000322...
 
8.
Entwistle, N.J. and McCune, V., 2009. The disposition to understand for oneself at university and beyond: Learning processes, the will to learn, and sensitivity to context. In L.F. Zhang and R.J. Sternberg (eds), 2009. Perspectives on the nature of intellectual styles. Springer: New York, 29-62.
 
9.
Entwistle, N.J. and Ramsden, P., 1982. Understanding student learning. Croom Helm: London.
 
10.
Entwistle, N. J., Tait, H. and McCune, V., 2000. Patterns of response to an approaches to studying inventory across contrasting groups and contexts. European Journal of the Psychology of Education 15, 33-48.
 
11.
Evans, C. and Waring, M., 2009. The place of cognitive style in pedagogy: Realizing potential in practice. In L. F. Zhang and Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), 2009. Perspectives on the nature of intellectual styles. Springer Publishing Company: New York, 169-208.
 
12.
Gadelrab, H.F., 2011. Factorial structure and predictive validity of Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) in Egypt: A confirmatory factor analysis approach. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology 9(3), 1197-1218.
 
13.
Hof, M., 2012. Questionnaire evaluation with factor analysis and Cronbach’s Alpha. [15 March 2017] http://www.let.rug.nl/nerbonne... student-papers/MHof-QuestionnaireEvaluation-2012-CronbachFactAnalysis.pdf.
 
14.
Holtbrügge, D., Mohr, A.T., 2010. Cultural Determinants of Learning Style Preferences. Academy of Management, Learning and Education, 9(4), 622-637.
 
15.
Lauria, J., 2010. Differentiation through learning style responsive strategies. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 24-29.
 
16.
Marton, F. and Saljo, R., 1976. On qualitative differences in learning. I. Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology 46, 4-11.
 
17.
Minotti, J.L., 2005. Eff ects of learning-style-based homework prescriptions on the achievement and attitudes of middle school students. NaSSP Bulletin 89(642), 67-89.
 
18.
Pieczywok, A., 2012. Edukacja dla bezpieczeństwa wobec zagrożeń i wyzwań i zagrożeń współczesności. Wydawnictwo AON, Warsaw.
 
19.
Pritchard, A., 2014. Ways of Learning: Learning Theories and Learning Styles in the Classroom. Routledge: New York.
 
20.
Rochford, R.A., 2004. Improving academic performance and retention among remedial students. The Community College Enterprise 10(2), 23-36.
 
21.
Sun, H., and Richardson, J.T.E., 2012. Perceptions of quality and approaches to studying in higher education: A comparative study of Chinese and British postgraduate students at six British business schools. Higher Education 63, 299-316.
 
22.
Tait, H., Entwistle, N.J. and McCune, V., 2000. ASSIST: A Reconceptualizaton of the Approaches to Studying Inventory. In C. Rust (ed.), 2000. Improving Students as Learners. Oxford Brookes University, the Oxford Center for Staff and Learning Development: Oxford, 262-271.
 
23.
Urych, I., 2016. Military class in Poland – experiences and perspectives. Security and Defence Quarterly 2(11), 112-134.
 
24.
Urych, I., 2018. Edukacja dla bezpieczeństwa. Współczesne kategorie. Wydawnictwo Akademii Sztuki Wojennej, Warsaw.
 
25.
Valadas, S.C.A.T.S., Goncalves, F.R. and Faisca, L.M., 2009. Approaches to studying in higher education Portuguese students: A Portuguese version of the approaches and study skills inventory for students. Higher Education 59, 259-275.
 
26.
Wang, K.H., Wang, T.H., Wang, W.L. and Huang, S.C., 2006. Learning styles and formative assessment strategy: enhancing student achievement in Web – based learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 22(3), 207-217.
 
eISSN:2544-994X
ISSN:2300-8741