RESEARCH PAPER
Lithuania in European Union common security and defence policy context
| 1 | Political Science Department, Gen. Jonas Žemaitis Lithuanian Military Academy, Lithuania |
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Donatas Palavenis
Political Science Department, Gen. Jonas Žemaitis Lithuanian Military Academy, Vilnius, Lithuania
Political Science Department, Gen. Jonas Žemaitis Lithuanian Military Academy, Vilnius, Lithuania
Submission date: 2019-04-02
Final revision date: 2019-04-25
Acceptance date: 2019-04-25
Online publication date: 2019-06-13
Publication date: 2019-06-28
Security and Defence Quarterly 2019;25(3):15–36
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objectives:
EU Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) that encompasses 29 nations is gaining momentum. The aim of this study is to acknowledge ongoing developments in EU CSDP and define their impact for Lithuanian defence and security policy.
Methods:
Comparative scientific literature and document analysis method was used throughout this study. Article firstly reviews a path of EU CSDP developments, outlines roles and responsibilities of EU structures and examines current activities in CSDP framework with the focus to Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO). Second part is devoted to consider Lithuanian’s role in current EU CSDP context, to outline decisions that Lithuanian authorities made to implement new PESCO initiative.
Results:
Study reveals that: CSDP remains adaptive framework for EU; established procedures ensure CSDP is in compromise with all of nations; PESCO initiative signals positive outcomes while reinforcing idea of “EU Strategic autonomy”. Furthermore it was indentified that: approved National Security Strategy backs current EU initiatives; PESCO could provide flexible response options without duplicating NATO’s efforts; national participation in PESCO initiatives will enable improvements in cyber security and will enable rapid access for possible EU and NATO troops deployments; participation in PESCO negotiation phase reached given political aims to seek more extensive projects and position nation within core members of EU.
Conclusions:
Lithuanian policies’ shift for deeper engagement in CSDP is likely shaped by recognition that strategic trans-Atlantic partnership is not certain anymore, as well as UK role at post-Brexit period as 3rd party.
EU Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) that encompasses 29 nations is gaining momentum. The aim of this study is to acknowledge ongoing developments in EU CSDP and define their impact for Lithuanian defence and security policy.
Methods:
Comparative scientific literature and document analysis method was used throughout this study. Article firstly reviews a path of EU CSDP developments, outlines roles and responsibilities of EU structures and examines current activities in CSDP framework with the focus to Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO). Second part is devoted to consider Lithuanian’s role in current EU CSDP context, to outline decisions that Lithuanian authorities made to implement new PESCO initiative.
Results:
Study reveals that: CSDP remains adaptive framework for EU; established procedures ensure CSDP is in compromise with all of nations; PESCO initiative signals positive outcomes while reinforcing idea of “EU Strategic autonomy”. Furthermore it was indentified that: approved National Security Strategy backs current EU initiatives; PESCO could provide flexible response options without duplicating NATO’s efforts; national participation in PESCO initiatives will enable improvements in cyber security and will enable rapid access for possible EU and NATO troops deployments; participation in PESCO negotiation phase reached given political aims to seek more extensive projects and position nation within core members of EU.
Conclusions:
Lithuanian policies’ shift for deeper engagement in CSDP is likely shaped by recognition that strategic trans-Atlantic partnership is not certain anymore, as well as UK role at post-Brexit period as 3rd party.
REFERENCES (31)
1.
Baltictimes, 2017. EU greenlights Lithuanians’ initiative to create cyber rapid response teams, 12 December, [online]. Available from: https://www.baltictimes.com/eu... [Accessed 29 March 2019].
2.
Bantas, D., 2015. Crisis Management in the View of the European Union, International Scientific Conference” Strategies XXI”. Carol I National Defence University, pp. 240.
3.
Biscop, S., 2017. European Defence: What’s in the CARDs for PESCO? Egmont Security Policy Briefs, No. 91.
4.
Blatgé, M., Boëbion, R., Fumex, C., Jafarli, Y., Kasimov, A., Kubiak, T., Planincic, A., Nougarede, J. and Medway, J. S., 2016. European Defence Is there a real political will? Strasbourg University, Strasbourg.
5.
BNS, 2016. Prezidentė apie gilesnę ES karinę integraciją: negali būti jokio dubliavimo su NATO, 9 September, [online]. Available from: https://www.lrt.lt/naujienos/l... [Accessed 21 April 2019].
6.
Churruca, C., 2000. Strengthening the European Union’s Common Foreign Policy: the European Council’s Decision to Develop an Autonomous Military Crisis Management Capability in the Context of Petersberg Tasks’. Humanitäres Völkerrecht4.
7.
Council of the European Union, 2018. Council decision of 6 March 2018 establishing the list of projects to be developed under PESCO. 1 edn. Brussels: Press office - General Secretariat of the Council.
8.
Council of the European Union, 2000. Santa Maria da Feira European Council 19 and 20 June 2000. Press Release: Sta Maria da Feira (19/6/2000), 200(1).
9.
EEAS, 2017. European Union Common Security and Defence Policy, Missions and Operations, Annual Report, 30 November, [online] Available from: https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/e... [Accessed 29 March 2019].
10.
EPP, 2015. Declaration of the EPP Summit, For a stronger European security and defence, 25 June, [online]. Available from: https://www.epp.eu/papers/for-... [Accessed 29 March 2019].
11.
European Commission and Juncker, J. C., 2017. White paper on the future of Europe: Reflections and scenarios for the EU27 by 2025. European Comission.
12.
European Parlament, 2017. Common Security and Defence Policy, Fact Sheets on the European Union, June, [online]. Available from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/... [Accessed 29 March 2019].
13.
Mickus, J., 2018. Lietuva ir ES gynybos integracija: didžioji strategija ir ateities scenarijai. Vilnius: Politikos analizės institutas, [online]. Available from: http://www.vilniusinstitute.lt... [Accessed 21 April 2019].
14.
Kirchner, E.J., 2006. The challenge of European Union security governance. JCMS: Journal of common market studies, 44(5), 947-968.
15.
Koenig, N. and Walter-Franke, M., 2017. France and Germany: spearheading a European security and defence union? Policy Paper, 202, pp. 19.
16.
Koutrakos, P., 2013. The EU common security and defence policy. Oxford University Press.
17.
Lazarou, E. and Friede, A. M., 2018. Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO): Beyond Establishment. European Parliament Briefing.
18.
Lintern, S., 2017. The EU Comprehensive approach: Roles of EEAS and HR EU External Action – from Crisis to Delivery, [online]. Available from: https://slideplayer.com/slide/... [Accessed 29 March 2019].
19.
Márquez Carrasco, C., Churruca Muguruza, C. and Alamillos Sánchez, R., 2016. Case study: Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP).
20.
Mattelaer, A.T., 2010. The CSDP mission planning process of the European Union: innovations and shortfalls. European integration online papers (EIoP), 14(9).
21.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs the Republic of Lithuania, 2017. Lithuanian contribution to implementation of the European Security and Defence Policy, 7 June, [online]. Available from: https://www.urm.lt/default/en/... [Accessed 29 March 2019].
22.
Ministry of National Defence Republic of Lithuania, 2018. Lithuania’s initiative of cyber rapid response force formation greenlighted in Brussels, 6 March, [online]. Available from: https://kam.lt/en/news_1098/cu... [Accessed 29 March 2019].
23.
Ministry of National Defence Republic of Lithuania, 2017. The White Paper on Lithuanian defence policy. Vilnius.
24.
Pirozzi, N., 2013. The EU’s comprehensive approach to crisis management. EU crisis management papers series.
25.
Rehrl, J. and Weisserth, H., 2012. Handbook on CSDP: The common security and defence policy of the European Union. Directorate for Security Policy of the Federal Ministry of Defence.
26.
Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania, 2017. Decision on the Position of the Republic of Lithuania on Joining Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) Initiated in the Framework of the Common Security and Defence Policy of the European Union. 20 September, [online]. Available from: https://www.lrs.lt/sip/portal.... [Accessed 29 March 2019].
27.
Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania, 2017. Seimas made a decision on the participation of Lithuanian troops in international operations,17 January, [online]. Available from: https://www.lrs.lt/sip/portal.... [Accessed 29 March 2019].
28.
Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania, 2017. Seimas approved the National Security Strategy, 17 January, [online]. Available from: https://www.lrs.lt/sip/portal.... [Accessed 29 March 2019].
29.
Solana, J., 2003. A secure Europe in a better world: European security strategy. içinde Klaus Schilder ve Tobias Hauschild, der., Civilian Perspective or Security Strategy.
30.
Thym, D., 2006. Beyond parliament’s Reach? The Role of the European Parliament in the CFSP. European Foreign Affairs Review, 11(1), 109-127.
31.
Whitman, R. and Juncos, A., 2009. The Lisbon Treaty and the Foreign, Security and Defence Policy: Reforms, Implementation and the Consequences of (non–) Ratification. European foreign affairs review, 14(1), 25-46.
RELATED ARTICLE
