On the theoretical and terminological premises for researching peace operations
 
More details
Hide details
1
General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Slovak Republic
 
2
Armed Forces Academy of General M. R. Štefánik
 
 
Publication date: 2014-03-31
 
 
Security and Defence Quarterly 2014;2(1):24-44
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The high dynamics of the changes in the security environment, deepening globalisation, and the growth of current and new, predominantly asymmetric, threats make permanent new demands on international society and require new more complex approaches towards the issue. One of the most significant tools the international community has for keeping peace and security on an international level, restraining centres of tension, consolidating or stabilising relations in crisis areas, and multilateral reconstruction and restoration of countries after armed conflicts, is represented by peace operations within international crisis management. Peace operations have changed a lot throughout the last fifty years, and today, unlike in the past, they represent highly complex, dynamic, demanding and multidimensional activities. Therefore, the main aim of the authors is to point out the significance of a theoretical and terminological basis for research in the field of peace operations.
REFERENCES (28)
1.
Bellamy, A. J. , Williams, P. 2004. Thinking anew about Peace Operation. In International Peacekeeping, 2004, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 1-15.
 
2.
Bellamy, A. J. , Williams, P., Griffin, S. 2004. Understanding Peace-keeping. Cambridge: Polity Press.
 
3.
Berdal, M., Economides, S. 2007. United Nations Interventionism 1991 – 2004. New York: Cambridge University Press.
 
4.
Brhlíková, R. 2013. Európska Unia a konflikty v jej susedstve. In Bezpečnostné fórum – zborník príspevkov z medzinárodnej vedeckej konferencie, Banská Bystrica. pp. 124-132.
 
5.
Bureš, O. 2007. Wanted: A Mid-Range Theory of International Peacekeeping. In International Studies Review, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 407-436.
 
6.
Bureš, O. 2008. Teorie a praxe postkonfliktní rekonstrukce. Plzeň: Vydavatelství a nakladatelství Aleš Čeněk.
 
7.
Diehl, P.F., Druckman, D, Wall, J. 1998. International peacekeeping and conflict resolution: A taxanomic analysis with implications. In Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 33-55.
 
8.
Diehl, P.F. 2008. Peace Operations. Cambridge: Polity Press.
 
9.
Donald, D. 2002. Neutrality, impartiality and UN peacekeeping at the beginning of the 21st century. In International Peacekeeping, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 21-38.
 
10.
Goulding, M. 1993. The Evolution of United Nations Peacekeeping. In International Affairs, Vol. 60, No. 3, pp. 451-464.
 
11.
Guéhenno, J.-M. 2002. On the challenges and achievements of reforming UN peace operations. In International Peacekeeping, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 69-80.
 
12.
Hanlon, J. 2010. How the Cold War shaped Mozambique today. Available at: http://www2.lse.ac.uk/IdEAS/pr... me/hanlon.pdf.
 
13.
Hansen, W. Ramsbotham, O. Woodhouse, T. 2004. Hawks and Doves: Peacekeeping and Conflict Resolution. Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management, pp. 1-21.
 
14.
Heldt, B. Wallesteen, P. 2006. Peacekeeping Operations: Global Patterns of Intervention and Success 1948 – 2004. Research Report No. 1. Folke Bernadotte Academy Publishers.
 
15.
Holmes, K.M. 1993. New World disorder: A Critique of the United Nations. In Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 323-340.
 
16.
Ivančik, R., Jurčak, V. 2011. Participácia Ozbrojených síl Slovenskej republiky na operáciách medzinárodného krízového manažmentu – príspevok Slovenskej republiky k medzinárodnej bezpečnosti. In Národná a medzinárodná bezpečnosť 2011 : zborník príspevkov z medzinárodnej vedeckej konferencie. liptovský Mikuláš : Vojenská akadémia ozbrojených síl generála M. R. Štefánika. pp. 95-104. Available at: http://www.aos.sk/struktura/ka....
 
17.
Ivančik, R., Jurčak, V. 2012. Sily rýchlej reakcie – príspevok Severoatlantickej aliancie k medzinárodnej bezpečnosti. In Vojenské rozhledy, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 55-64. Available at: scripts/file.php?id=125148&down=yes.
 
18.
Ivančik, R., Kelemen, M. 2011. EEurópske bojové skupiny – príspevok Európskej únie k medzinárodnej bezpečnosti. In Vojenské reflexie, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 73-83. Available at: http://www.aos.sk/casopisy/ref....
 
19.
Jurčak, V. et al. 2009.Organizácie medzinárodného krízového manažmentu. Liptovský Mikuláš: Akadémia ozbrojených síl gen. M. R. Štefánika.
 
20.
Ryan, S. 2000. United Nations Peacekeeping: A Matter of Principles? In International Peacekeeping, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 27-47.
 
21.
Stejskalová, L. 2011. Komparace základních principů mírových operací OSN, NATO operací na podporu míru a operací krizového manažmentu EU. Brno: Fakulta sociálních studií, Masarykova univerzita v Brně.
 
22.
Tardy, T. 2004. Introduction. In Tardy, T. (ed.), Peace Operations after 11 September 2001. New York: Frank Cass.
 
23.
UN. 1992. An Agenda for Peace. Preventive Diplomacy, Peacemaking and Peacekeeping. New York. Available at: http://www.un.org/Docs/SG/agpe....
 
24.
UN. 2005. Jn larger freedom: Towards development, security and human rights for all (A/59/2005). Report of the UN Secretary-General. Available at: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/....
 
25.
UN. 2008. United Nations Peacekeeping Operations. Principles and Guidelines. New York: Department of Peacekeeping Operations.
 
26.
UN. 2009. UN Peacekeeping. Annual Report of the Secretary-General. Available at: http://www.un.org/en/peacekeep....
 
27.
Urbanovska, J. 2010. Vliv změn v bezpečnostním prostředí na budoucí použití jednotek AČR v mírových operacích. Brno: Fakulta ekonomiky a managementu Univerzity obrany v Brně.
 
28.
Zuna, J. 2010. Vliv změn v bezpečnostním prostředí na budoucí použití jednotek AČR v mírových operacích. Brno: Fakulta ekonomiky a managementu Univerzity obrany v Brně.
 
eISSN:2544-994X
ISSN:2300-8741
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top